Redistricting

Do Ineligible Voters Infringe on Eligible Voter’s Rights?

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

The Supreme Court will decide soon whether to take the case of a Texas voter who claims that her vote has been unconstitutionally diluted because her rural district has substantially more voters compared to other, urban districts comprised of many noncitizen, ineligible voters.

The claim is that this makes her vote less influential than her counterparts in urban districts. The practical question in this case is whether line-drawers should be using ‘total population’ or “citizen voting age population’ as the measure for drawing equally populated election districts. This Cato Institute article explains the case; Evenwel v. Abbott  in more detail.

Tagged as: , , ,

Categorised in: Lawsuits, malapportionment, Redistricting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

%d bloggers like this: