Redistricting

Federal District Court Finds Partisan Gerrymander in Wisconsin Assembly Map

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

wisconsinact43-assemblydistrictsWisconsin –  A three-judge federal district court in Wisconsin has invalidated the Republican-drawn state assembly district map enacted in August 2011 as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.  If the ruling stands – and that’s a very big “IF,” this case will be the first successful approach to creating a workable standard for courts to use in determining whether a partisan gerrymander rises to the level of impermissible gerrymandering under the first amendment and equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.  Read more in the New York Times ,  Salon.com, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and Rick Hasen’s Electionlawblog.        Read the District Court Opinion.

                      Key Info

– The maps were complaint with traditional redistricting principles, but the majority opinion details defendants’ copious use of “composite partisan scoring” for all of the maps it considered.

– After enactment of the assembly map, In 2012, the Republican Party received 48.6% of the two-party statewide vote share for Assembly candidates and won 60 of the 99 seats in the Wisconsin Assembly. In 2014, the Republican Party received 52% of the two-party statewide vote share and won 63 assembly seats.

– The court invalidated the legislature’s 2012 map but delayed its decision on whether to establish a remedial map of its own.

– The court also deferred a decision on whether to grant plaintiff’s motion to enjoin the state from seating newly elected legislators from the disputed map.

– The majority opinion was based in part on its acceptance of a new measurement standard proposed by plaintiffs referred to as Efficiency Gap Analysis.

– This case is very likely to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on direct appeal.  The outcome could hinge on a new appointee of the incoming Trump administration.

 

Tagged as: , ,

Categorised in: Gerrymanders, LATEST, Lawsuits, Redistricting

4 Responses »

Trackbacks

  1. Efficiency Gap Analysis Gets This Early Critique from Princeton Professor – Redistrictingonline.org
  2. Briefs on Timing of a Remedy Filed in Wisconsin Partisan Gerrymandering Case – Redistrictingonline.org
  3. The Efficiency Gap Visualized Through the Decades – Redistrictingonline.org
  4. Michigan Launches Anti-Gerrymandering Campaign on Four Fronts – RedistrictingOnline.org

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

%d bloggers like this: